Monday, 26 April 2021

Characteristics of Organizational Systems (MIS 26.04.2021)

Characteristics of Organizational Systems

 

Characteristics of an effective organizational structure including clearly defined roles of authority, detailed job descriptions, objective benchmarks and effective two-way communications between departments and between management and staff.

1. Organizing by Work Specialization

Work specialization, also referred to as the division of labour, is the degree to which specific tasks within an organization are broken down into individual jobs. When work specialization is extensive, a company may assign a single task to an individual as part of a larger project.

Often, this type of environment creates repetitive, narrow, smaller tasks. For example, assembly line factories may designate a single task, such as running a machine or welding a part, for the completion of an end product. On the other hand, companies may decide to enlarge jobs for the purpose of challenging employees or giving them additional responsibilities.

2. Using Traditional Departmentalization

Departmentalization describes the way in which an organization groups different jobs or segments of its company together. For example, a functional organizational structure groups jobs according to function, such as marketing, sales, customer service and manufacturing.

An organization that uses a divisional approach groups according to geography, such as a western and eastern region. Other forms of departmentalization include product, customer or market departmentalization.

3. Hierarchy of Authority

One of the most common forms of small-business management models use a hierarchical organizational structure, which uses a top-down approach. Hierarchy of authority–or chain of command–refers to an organization's line of authority and describes who reports to whom. Related to hierarchy of authority is the span of control, which refers to the number of subordinates over which managers have authority.

Organizational structures can either be flat or tall. Flat structures have fewer levels of authority and wide spans of control. For example, a small startup company may position the CEO at the top, who has authority over all other company employees. Tall organizational structures, such as larger companies and corporations, have many levels of authority and narrow spans of control.

4. Line and Staff Relationships

Line and staff relationships extend throughout the organizational structure and describe the way people are involved in the organization. Line managers are responsible for achieving company objectives or goals and include those in the direct line or chain of command.

Staff employees or managers give advice or make recommendations to line managers and support the overall operations. In retail corporations, for example, line employees may include department managers, store managers, the vice president and president of operations, and the board of directors.

In contrast, a scientific research organization may have scientists and researchers as line managers and administrative employees as staff employees.

5. Decentralization and Centralization

Decentralized organizational structures spread decision-making responsibilities to lower-level managers and some non-managerial employees. In contrast, a centralized organization maintains control and decision-making responsibilities near the top of the company.

For example, companies that have franchise operations may centralize control at company headquarters. Whether a company is decentralized or centralized, however, may depend on several factors, such as how many hierarchical levels the organization has or the extent to which a company is geographically dispersed.

 

6. Common Elements of Organizations

From a manager’s point of view, operations are made successful by instilling a common purpose to create a coordinated effort across the organization and organizing resources based on tasks and decision making. Each of the four elements is relatively straightforward in theory but represents a critical component of an effective structure.

 

7. Common Purpose

An organization without a clear purpose or mission soon begins to drift and become disorganized. A common purpose unifies employees or members and gives everyone an understanding of the organization’s direction. Ensuring that the common purpose is effectively communicated across organizations (particularly large organizations with many moving parts) is a central task for managers. Managers communicate this purpose by educating all employees on the general strategy, mission statement, values, and short- and long-term objectives of the organization.

 

8. Coordinated Effort

Coordinating effort involves working together in a way that maximizes resources. The common purpose is achieved through the coordinated effort of all individuals and groups within an organization. The broader group’s diverse skill sets and personalities must be leveraged in a way that adds value. The act of coordinating organizational effort is perhaps the most important responsibility of managers because it motivates and distributes human resources to capture value.

 

9. Division of Labour

Division of labour is also known as work specification for greater efficiency. It involves delegating specific parts of a broader task to different people within the organization based upon their particular abilities and skills. Using division of labour, an organization can parcel out a complex work effort for specialists to perform. By systematically dividing complex tasks into specialized jobs, an organization uses its human resources more efficiently.

 

10. Hierarchy of Authority

Hierarchy of authority is essentially the chain of command—a control mechanism for making sure the right people do the right things at the right time. While there are a wide variety of organizational structures—some with more centralization of authority than others—hierarchy in decision making is a critical factor for success. Knowing who will make decisions under what circumstances enables organizations to be agile, while ambiguity of authority can often slow the decision-making process. Authority enables organizations to set directions and select strategies, which can in turn enable a common purpose.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment